This week, world leaders descended on Manhattan for the UN General Assembly. It’s also New York Climate Week—investors, policymakers, advocates, and journalists are colliding at panels, talks, and fancy dinners.

With so a host of climate voices in one place, the discourse can feel a little louder than usual. This year, the unavoidable topic is artificial intelligence.

There’s been a growing tension bubbling up about AI’s impacts on climate and climate tech. Depending on where you stand, you might point to AI’s potential for advancing research, or to the way funding and attention from Big Tech is trickling into energy startups. Or you might focus on the emissions-heavy natural-gas buildout that’s unfolding to meet the sector’s electricity demand.

In a related development, everyone seems to agree that AI is critical. The big question for those in the climate world, and the conversation I’m constantly having and hearing this week, involves how you see its influence unfolding.

UN Secretary-General António Guterres highlighted the AI and climate crossover in a speech on the first day of the assembly. “The climate crisis fuels instability and displacement,” Guterres stated. “Artificial intelligence could help solve all these challenges, or it could make them worse.”

It feels relevant that this year is the first that the world has really had to grapple with the fact that climate goals are slipping out of reach. A recent report from the UN Environment Program noted that the world has nearly passed the point where we could possibly keep warming to less than 1.5 °C above preindustrial levels.

Furthermore, since we’ve essentially missed this target, the report lays out the need not only to quickly and drastically reduce greenhouse-gas emissions, but also to employ carbon removal to help suck up emissions that have already been released into the atmosphere.

The billion-dollar question is whether AI could help with any of this.

The energy-intensive technology is certainly shining a spotlight on the need to build out electricity supplies and shore up grid reliability. The result is more attention and money for energy technologies, some of which happen to be low- or zero-emissions.

Additionally, as I’ve covered before, startups across the energy and climate sectors are benefiting. Firms in nuclear, geothermal, wind, and solar power have signed deals with the likes of Google, Meta, and others looking to power their new or growing data centers.

Global climate-tech investment from venture capital hit $26 billion in the first half of 2026, based on to data from Currence, a finance tracker for the industry. That’s 55% higher than last year, and products and services for data centers are getting a massive slice of that pie.

But as a Semafor piece about the report points out, some sectors are slipping through the cracks: Carbon management and low-carbon fuels saw VC investment plummet this year. These are essential solutions for addressing climate change but may not be able to sell themselves to a data center.

It is worth noting that so far, the data center buildout has come with a hefty emissions toll. A few years ago, Microsoft, Google, and Meta all had ambitious goals to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions. Now they’ve all seen emissions rise, largely because of data centers that are needed to power AI.

Some people are optimistic. AI could help speed up progress in areas like the search for new catalysts, as Evelyn Wang, MIT’s VP of energy and climate, pointed out during a panel. And data centers won’t add to climate and water problems forever, Wang told the Associated Press. (She puts the timeline at about a decade until data centers no longer add to planet-warming emissions.)

But a whole lot of natural gas is coming online to meet the immediate demand created by new data centers. And once those power plants are built, they have a decades-long lifetime.

In the broader context, that’s partly why public pushback to AI is growing—people are seeing more pollution and noise near these data centers and the power plants that provide them with electricity. Overall, what I’m hearing this week is that numerous in the climate sector are skeptical of AI, at best.

“AI leaders are now on thin ice when it comes to license to operate and sinking deep underwater when it comes to public support,” mentioned UN climate chief Simon Stiell in a speech this week. “Tech titans need to start showing why the benefits of AI outweigh its skyrocketing costs—for the several, not just the tiny few.”

This article is from The Spark, MIT Technology Review’s weekly climate newsletter. To receive it in your inbox every Wednesday, sign up here.

Notably, huge grid-scale batteries are thriving, but smaller residential systems have lagged.

El Niño? Climate change? All of the above?

Companies are developing new enrichment technology that could unlock previously overlooked resources.

Significantly, startup Switch Bioworks hopes to use microbes to reduce demand for chemical fertilizer.

Discover special offers, top stories, upcoming events, and more.

Thank you for submitting your email!

Meanwhile, it looks like something went wrong.

We’re having trouble saving your preferences. Try refreshing this page and updating them one more time. If you continue to get this message, reach out to us at customer-service@technologyreview.com with a list of newsletters you’d like to receive.